Cyber Resiliency for Fog and Edge Computing Devices
AI Overview
This Direct to Phase II opportunity seeks proven cyber defense technology for fog and edge computing devices that can autonomously detect and respond to attacks. Proposals must demonstrate a working prototype and scalable architecture capable of preventing or mitigating cyber threats across distributed edge-node environments.
This summary is AI-generated from the official solicitation.
Key Details
Official Description
This topic is intended for technology proven ready to move directly into a Phase II. Therefore, a Phase I award is not required. The offeror is required to provide detailed documentation in the Direct to Phase II proposal which demonstrates accomplishment of a "Phase I-like" effort, including a feasibility study. This feasibility study should include an approach, architecture and previous demonstration of a limited-scope prototype with the ability to prevent or mitigate a single class of cyber-a...
Change History
Informational change · Description
Cyber Resiliency for Fog and Edge Computing Devices
- Answer added to Q1 (previously unanswered/pending): The government responded that the ability to respond to all types of attacks would be beneficial, so the prototype is not limited to prevention.
- Autonomy clarified: Detection and response are expected to be autonomous with human oversight, with the goal of presenting autonomous detection and autonomous response options to a human who selects the course of action.
- Why it matters: Applicants whose feasibility prototype offers only automated prevention with logging (the originally open question) should now plan for autonomous detection and response options, with a human making the final course-of-action choice. Cryptographic verification alone may not fully satisfy the expected scope.
Informational change · Description
Cyber Resiliency for Fog and Edge Computing Devices
- New Q&A added (Q1): Asks whether using cryptographic verification to block execution of unauthenticated or tampered firmware, updates, or commands (supply-chain and remote-exploit attack classes) on an edge node counts as preventing a "single class of cyber-attack."
- Second part of Q1: Asks whether the feasibility prototype must include autonomous detection and response, or whether automated prevention with logging is acceptable.
Why it matters: The answer is not yet provided in this version, so applicants cannot yet tell whether a prevention-only design (cryptographic verification plus logging) meets the single-attack-class requirement or whether they must build autonomous detection and response into the prototype. Applicants with prevention-focused architectures should watch for the official response before committing scope and budget, and should consider contacting the agency if the question remains unanswered near the close date.
Cyber Resiliency for Fog and Edge Computing Devices
New opportunity: Cyber Resiliency for Fog and Edge Computing Devices
Similar Opportunities
Technical Data Package Modernization for Information Assurance and Secure Data Exchange
Due November 25, 2026
Pre-ReleaseAgile Autonomous Technical Data Package to Path Robotic Task Specification
Due November 25, 2026
ActiveResearch and Development (R&D) for Next Generation Aircraft Protection Technologies
Due November 23, 2030
Get Alerts for Opportunities Like This
RallyProp monitors thousands of funding sources and sends instant alerts when opportunities match your technology and capabilities.
Start Free Trial